tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9880373836357334522012-02-04T10:51:10.378-08:00Supreme Court Bloggerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09851435002304383430noreply@blogger.comBlogger11100tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-988037383635733452.post-34015009414671927142007-04-11T14:45:00.000-07:002010-03-28T12:37:09.245-07:00<strong><span style="color: rgb(204, 204, 204);">.<br /><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 102);">THE HIGHLY CONTROVERSIAL 5-4 GLOBAL WARMING CASE IS IN!<br />Supreme Court Blogger looks at the facts, the court's analysis, and the dissent's arguments thoroughly, making sense from a particularly confusing and disorganized decision. Beyond that, the blog tries to explain why this decision is unusually convoluted, and provides some unique legal analysis. </span><a href="http://massachusetts-v-epa-scm.blogspot.com/"><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 102);">http://massachusetts-v-epa-scm.blogspot.com/</span></a><br /><br /></span>Supreme Court Blogger</strong> takes a detailed look at recent supreme court cases. These are not standard "case briefs," although they cover the rulings and the laws behind them.<br /><br />You may leave comments on this site without having to register. Feel free to provide comments, suggestions, disagreements, or other information. <br /><br /><br /><strong><span style="color: rgb(51, 51, 255);">THE CASES:<br /></span></strong><br /><strong>EPA Must Rule on Global Warming,<br />Not Give a "Laundry List" of Excuses; <em>and</em><br />States May Sue The Federal Government<br />to Enforce the Law</strong><br />Massachusetts, et al., v. Environmental Protection Agency, et al., April, 2007<br /><a href="http://massachusetts-v-epa-scm.blogspot.com/">http://massachusetts-v-epa-scm.blogspot.com/</a><br /><br /><strong>International Law That Protects<br />Individual Rights Not Applied,<br />Right To Contact A Home Country Is Undermined</strong><br />Sanchez-Llamas v. Oregon, June, 2006<br /><a href="http://sanchez-llamas-v-oregon.blogspot.com/">http://sanchez-llamas-v-oregon.blogspot.com/</a><br /><br /><strong>Where The Evidence Used Against A Person In Court Is<br />Not Called "Testimony,"<br />There Is NO RIGHT TO CROSS EXAMINATION.</strong><br />Davis v. Washington, June, 2006<br /><a href="http://davis-v-washington.blogspot.com/">http://davis-v-washington.blogspot.com/</a><br /><br /><strong>There Is No Remedy For A Violation Of The<br />KNOCK AND ANNOUNCE RULE</strong><br />Hudson v. Michigan, June, 2006<br /><a href="http://hudson-v-michigan.blogspot.com/">http://hudson-v-michigan.blogspot.com/</a><div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/988037383635733452-3401500941467192714?l=supremecourtblogger.blogspot.com' alt='' /></div>Supreme Court Bloggerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09851435002304383430noreply@blogger.com9